Q&A on a blue background

This week’s question came from Troy — which is to say, it arrived with a fully developed argument attached.

Some questions are simple on the surface. This was not one of those questions.

The question

“Can fish see water?”

He wasn’t asking because he didn’t know. He was asking because he’d already been thinking about it — and he had a framework ready.

Troy’s logic

“Humans breathe air, but we can’t see it. Fish breathe water — they can’t breathe air. It’s the exact opposite of us. So wouldn’t that mean fish can see air, but not water?”

That’s a legitimately tight argument. The invisible medium is the one you’re built to survive in. You don’t perceive what you’re fully immersed in.

But Troy wasn’t stopping there. Once the premise holds, the implications start compounding fast.

The extended universe

“What about birds and bats? Are they just swimming, from a fish’s point of view? Are planes just another kind of submarine?”

A reasonable extension of the logic. And then:

“Could you consider the Hindenburg an Oceangate incident?”

This one landed differently. We sat with it for a moment.

We did circle back to the science. If you open your eyes underwater, you can see objects, other people, bubbles — but the water itself disappears. Just blur and refraction. Troy clocked this:

“We’re not actually seeing water. We’re seeing the impurities in it — not the pure, invisible liquid itself, but what it’s carrying, or the surface it makes with air.”

The science bit

This holds up. Fish likely don’t perceive water itself — they perceive what’s in it. Same principle we apply underwater: the medium vanishes, the contents remain. The question isn’t whether fish see water, it’s whether any creature perceives the medium it lives inside.

Mid-conversation, Troy surfaced a YouTube video he’d watched 40 minutes earlier — two guys on Twitch asking essentially the same question. The video was briefly interrupted by breaking news that the Kansas City Chiefs might have lost a game. Troy clocked that faster than he clocked the fish question.

For the record: Troy is not a Kansas City Chiefs fan. When the Chiefs lose, he calls it an American W, and he will pause any philosophical inquiry — including this one — to acknowledge it. We respect the consistency.

The verdict

“I think fish can see air. Or at least the impurities in it. But — how do we even know?”

Me: “How do we know?”

“I don’t know. I’m not a fish.”

I love this kid.

And that’s Troy’s Truth Booth. Start with a question that sounds like a joke. Build real logic. Make at least one historically devastating comparison. Land on an honest answer. Every week.

More Q&A with Troy

Should Kids Be Banned from Social Media?

Should Kids Be Banned from Social Media?

Australia just made it a law. Troy has thoughts — and some receipts. The Law Australia's Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024 bans anyone under 16 from creating or holding accounts on social media platforms. Companies — not parents — are...

read more
Are Hot Dogs Tacos?

Are Hot Dogs Tacos?

When a simple question leads to a deep dive into food philosophy, ocean soup theory, and why I had to step in with the facts. The Core Question: Are Hot Dogs Tacos? Troy kicked off this philosophical food fight with a straightforward claim: hot dogs are tacos....

read more
Learning New Things

Learning New Things

A candid conversation between Troy and his mom about comfort zones, learning preferences, and the challenge of changing what you've always known. The Question That Started It All Mom: "Are you comfortable learning new things, and what was the last new thing you...

read more

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *